EasyBR vs BitBrowser

The main differences between EasyBR and BitBrowser are profile storage, free capacity, platform coverage and automation workflow. The table below uses the same public fields so individuals, operators and developers can compare them consistently.

Verdict

Choose EasyBR first if local control, profile isolation or its listed free allowance matters most. Evaluate BitBrowser first if its platform coverage, team workflow or public integrations better match your needs. Confirm current plans and documentation on both official websites.

Comparison table

Starting price	EasyBR	BitBrowser
Free allowance	5 个环境终身免费	10 个档案永久免费
Starting price	$3+/month	$10/月起（50 个档案）
Profiles	以官网当前套餐为准	未公开
Platforms	Windows, macOS	Windows, macOS
Browser engine	chromium	chromium
Storage	local-first	local-and-cloud
API
Automation
Proxy

EasyBR: strengths and best-fit scenarios

本地优先
有免费额度
支持 Windows 和 macOS

multi-account · team-workflows · proxy-management

BitBrowser: strengths and best-fit scenarios

有公开产品资料

multi-account · chinese-language-users

Scenario guidance

EasyBR

multi-account

EasyBR

team-workflows

BitBrowser

multi-account

BitBrowser

chinese-language-users

Frequently asked questions

Which is a better fit: EasyBR or BitBrowser?

How should I verify the starting price?

Plans, pricing and features can change; confirm them on the official websites.

Do API and automation mean the same thing?

EasyBR and BitBrowser API and automation capabilities should be confirmed in the official documentation; this table only records publicly stated capabilities.

Plans, pricing and features can change; confirm them on the official websites. · Updated 2026-08-11